Circularity & Waste Theatre

The Path Towards Successful Producer Responsibility Schemes

12 Sep (Fri) Day 2 : 14:00 – 14:50

As Hong Kong accelerates its transition toward a circular economy, Producer Responsibility Schemes (PRS) are gaining traction as a key policy tool to reduce waste, promote recycling, and drive sustainable product design. By placing the onus on producers to manage the lifecycle of their products—from production to post-consumer disposal—PRS can help shift Hong Kong’s waste management system from a linear to a circular model.

This session will explore the current and future landscape of PRS in Hong Kong. Speakers will examine the multifaceted challenges that come with designing and implementing effective PRS—from regulatory hurdles and infrastructure gaps to industry compliance and public participation.

Public acceptance is vital to the success of any PRS. The session will also discuss strategies to build awareness, encourage behavioural change, and foster a culture of shared responsibility among consumers. Drawing on successful models from around the world, the panel will compare international approaches to PRS and distill key lessons that can inform Hong Kong’s own path towards successful implementation of the scheme.

Learnings

  • How can engagement and education drive acceptance and compliance amongst the public?
  • What are the building blocks of a successful PRS framework, and how can they be tailored to Hong Kong’s unique context?
  • What are the major implementation challenges—from logistics and enforcement to industry alignment?
  • What international PRS success stories offer transferable insights for Hong Kong?

Post-event Actions

  • Initiate conversations with producers, recyclers, and policymakers to fine-tune practical PRS mechanisms suitable for Hong Kong.
  • Facilitate organizations’ readiness for PRS compliance and explore circular business opportunities.
  • Stakeholders to develop or participate in public-facing campaigns or partnerships to support behavioural change and public participation in the PRS.

Supported by